Volume 12 NO VON Number 1 2002 A Synopsis of the Central Asian Rhammatophyllum (Brassicaceae) Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A. Oliver Appel Bredkamp 36E, 22589 Hamburg, Germany Abstract. The genera Koeiea and Prionotrichon are reduced to the synonymy of Rhammatophyllum. The new combinations R. afghanicum, R. erysimo- ides, R.flexuosum, R. gaudanense, R. ghoranum, R. kamelinii, and R. pseudoparrya are proposed. A key to all nine species of the central Asian Rhamma¬ tophyllum is presented. Key Words: Asia, Brassicaceae, Koeiea, Mito- phyllum, Prionotrichon, Rhammatophyllum. During work on the Brassicaceae for the forth¬ coming volume of Kubitzki’s Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, it became evident that the limits of several genera need adjustment and that some nomenelatural changes are necessary. A case in point is the delimitation of the genera Rhammato¬ phyllum O. E. Schulz, Prionotrichon Botschantsev & Vvedensky, anti Koeiea K. H. Rechinger. Schulz (1933a) proposed the genus Mitophyllum to accommodate a species previously placed in Ar- abis L, A. pachyrhizum Karelin & Kirilov, which is endemic to Kazakhstan. He (Schulz, 1933b) re¬ named the genus Rhammatophyllum because he discovered that his Mitophyllum is a later homonym to that of Greene (1904). Mitophyllum Greene is now recognized as a synonym of Streptanthus Nut- tall (Al-Shehbaz, 1985; Rollins. 1993). Rhamma¬ tophyllum remained monotypic until Botschantsev (1952) and Vassiljeva (1969) each added another species. Botschantsev and Vvedensky (1948) proposed the genus Prionotrichon and separated it from the closely related Rhammatophyllum by flower color, lack of the septum venation, and the type ol in¬ dumentum. The (lower color is said to he yellow in Prionotrichon and white in Rhammatophyllum, hut the type species of the latter genus has creamy white to yellow (lowers. The trichomes in both R. pachyrhizum and R. frutex are medifixed, sessile, and their two rays are rather soft and often crisped. Typically malpighiaceous trichomes, which are found in Erysimum I,., Lohularia Desvaux, Farsetia Turra, and many other genera of Brassicaceae, are also medifixed and 2-rayed, but their rays are al¬ ways rigid and straight. In the two original species that Botschantsev and Vvedensky (1948) assigned to Prionotrichon, P. pseudoparrya and P. erysimo- ides, the trichomes strongly resemble those of Rhammatophyllum in having soft, crisped rays, hut their two rays have a few minute lateral branches. Finally, Botschantsev and Vvedensky (1948) indi¬ cated that the septum in Rhammatophyllum is 3- veined, while that of Prionotrichon is not veined. However, the septum in species of Prionotrichon has a broad central band sometimes marked by the presence of either a distinct midvein or three faint veins. Veined septa are rare in the Brassicaceae, and their occurrence in both Rhammatophyllum and Prionotrichon further supports the union of the two genera. Therefore, we believe that the differ¬ ences in flower color, indumentum, and septum, which were claimed by Botschantsev and Vveden¬ sky (1948) to support the recognition of two inde¬ pendent genera, are artificial and only one genus is represented. Botschantsev (1966, 1987) expanded the limits Novon 12: 1-4. 2002. 2 No von of Prionotrichon to include most of the species that Rechinger (1954, 1964, 1968) placed in Koeiea. It is interesting to note that Rechinger (1954) as¬ signed Koeiea to the tribe Alysseae but later lie (Rechinger, 1968) assigned it to the tribe Matthi- oleae. By contrast, Rotschantsev (1966, 1987) placed the combined genus in the Arabideae, whereas Schulz (1936) placed Rhammatophyllum next to Erysimum in the tribe Hesperideae. The placement by these three authors of what we con¬ sider one genus in four tribes clearly shows the difficulties in the evaluation of generic and tribal relationships in the Rrassicaceae based on few mor¬ phological characters. Without molecular studies on this complex, it is uncertain what the nearest relatives of Rhammatophyllum (including Koeiea and Prionotrichon) are. On the basis of habit, leaf and fruit morphology, and indumentum, it appears that Rhammatophyllum is perhaps more related to Erysimum than to any other genus. Rechinger's (1968) account of Koeiea for Elora franica included a heterogeneous assemblage of species now assigned to different genera. For ex¬ ample, K. altimurana K. II. Rechinger was shown by Botsehantsev (1987) to he a synonym of A rah is fruticulosa C. A. Meyer, a species also treated in that same flora (Hedge, 1968) in a different tribe, Arabideae. It is highly unlikely, however, that A. fruticulosa would eventually be retained in Arabis because the genus, as presently delimited, is clear¬ ly polyphyletic and needs to be divided into several segregates (Koch cl al.. 1999). Polatsehek and Rechinger (1968) retained Erys¬ imum gaudanense Litvinov in Erysimum despite their observation that the trichomes are not typical of that genus because they have soft, crisped rays with minute lateral branches. On the basis of tri- clmme morphology and other aspects of the plant, Botsehantsev (1987) was correct in placing the spe¬ cies in Prionotrichon and in considering it to be closely related to the species we recognize herein as Rhammatophyllum erysimoides, R. ghoranum, R. kamelinii , and R. pseudoparrya. Rechinger (1968) transferred Parrya karatavica Lipschitz to Koeiea , but because of its typically stellate, sessile, rigidly rayed trichomes and den¬ tate. canescent, closely overlapping leaves, the spe¬ cies does not resemble any member of Parrya or Rhammatophyllum (including Koeiea and Priono¬ trichon). Nabiev (1972) placed the species in his monotypie genus Botschantzevia and indicated that it differs from Arabis , Prionotrichon, and Rham¬ matophyllum in having different trichomes. How¬ ever, the placement of this species in a monotypie genus is inappropriate, and we believe that it shows more affinities to Erysimum than to any of the gen¬ era above. As delimited herein, Rhammatophyllum includes nine species distributed from eastern Turkmenistan eastward through Afghanistan, northern Tajikistan, southern Kyrgyzstan, eastern Kazakhstan, and the Altay region of westernmost Mongolia. The genus has not yet been collected from western Xinjiang (China), but it is likely to be found at least in the western parts of Dzungaria. Rhammatophyllum consists of shrubs or subshrubs with linear to fili¬ form. entire leaves that are attenuate into a persis¬ tent base, often slightly swollen nodes, minutely stalked, softly submalpighiaceous, or rarely sub- dendritic trichomes, yellow, creamy white, or rarely purple petals, latiseptate, torulose fruits, distinctly veined fruit valves, and flattened, winged, mar¬ gined, or rarely wingless seeds. We consider the presence of incumbent cotyledons in the species originally placed in Rhammatophyllum and aecum- bent ones in those assigned to Prionotrichon to he a minor character insufficient to support the main¬ tenance of two genera. |{|iaiiiiiialopliylliiin (). E. Schulz, Report. Sp. Nov. Regni Veg. 33: 190. 1933. Based on Mi- tophyllum 0. E. Schulz, Notizbl. Bot. Cart. Berlin-Dahlem II: 872. 1933, non Greene, Leafl. Bot. Observ. Grit. 1: 88. 1904. TYPE: Rhammatophyllum pachyrhizum (Karelin & Kirilov) ( ). E. Schulz. Prionotrichon Botsehantsev & Vvedensky, Bot. Mater. Gerh. Inst. Bot. Zool. Akad. Nauk Uzbekst. S.S.B. 12: 8. 1948. Syn. nov. TYPE: Prionotrichon pseu¬ doparrya Botsehantsev & Vvedensky. Koeiea k. II. Rechinger, Anz. Osterr. Akad. Wiss.. Math.- Naturwiss. kl. 91: 60. 1954. Syn. nov. 14 PE: Koeiea afghanica k. H. Rechinger. Plants subshrubs or shrubs. Trichomes unicel¬ lular. eglandular, softly malpighiaceous, suhmal- pighiaeeous with a few lateral minute branches, rarely subdendritic. Stems erect to ascending, branched, slightly swollen at nodes. Basal leaves absent. Catiline leaves sessile or rarely petiolate, filiform to linear or lanceolate, not auriculate, en¬ tire. Racemes several flowered, ebracteate, corym¬ bose, elongated in fruit. Fruiting pedicels slender, ascending to divaricate. Sepals oblong, deciduous, ascending, subequal, base of lateral pair not sac¬ cate. margin membranous. Petals yellow, creamy white, or rarely purple, longer than sepals, distinct¬ ly clawed; blade obovate to spatulate, apex obtuse. Stamens 6. tetradynamous; filaments not dilated or slightly flattened at base; anthers oblong, apiculate at apex. Nectar glands confluent and subtending Volume 12, Number 1 2002 Al-Shehbaz & Appel Central Asian Rhammatophyllum 3 bases of all stamens; median glands present or ab¬ sent; lateral glands often annular. Ovules 16—40 per ovary. Fruit dehiscent siliques, linear, latiseptate, sessile or shortly stipitate; valves leathery, with a distinct midvein, hairy as leaves, torulose; replum rounded in cross section, visible; septum complete, membranous, veinless or with 1—3 longitudinal veins; style obsolete or distinct and to 2 mm long; stigma capitate, entire or 2-lobed. Seeds uniseriate. winged, margined, or wingless, oblong, strongly flattened; seed coat not mucilaginous when wetted: cotyledons accumbent or rarely incumbent. 1 . Rhammatophyllum pachyrhizum (Karelin & Kirilov) (). E. Schulz, Repert. Sp. Nov. Regni Veg. 33: 190. 1933. Arabis pachyrhiza Karelin & Kirilov, Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 15: 144. 1842. Mitophyllum pachyrhizum (Ka¬ relin & Kirilov) 0. E. Schulz, Not izbl . Bot. Cart. Berlin-Dahlem 11: 872. 1933. TYPE: [Kazakhstan. Dzungaria], Bischtas Mis., be¬ tween Ayaguz and Donsyk, 1841. G. S. Karelin & I. P. Kirilov 1193 (holotype, EE; isotypes, P, TK). Distribution. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan. We have not seen the type collection of Rham¬ matophyllum krascheninnikovii A. N. Vassiljeva (Vassiljeva, 1969), and based on its similarity in flower color and other characters to R. pachyrhizum , we follow Czerepanov (1995) in reducing the former to synonymy of the latter. 2. Khnmmntophy Hum frutex Botschantsev & Vvedensky, Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Uzbeksk. S.S.R. 13: 9. 1952. TYPE: [Kazakhstan]. W Betpak Data, vicinity of Ken- derlik, red clay slopes, 24 May 1936, B. Mi¬ ronov & V. Pazi 353 (holotype, TAK). Distribution. Endemic to Kazakhstan. 3. Rhummutophy lhim erysimoides (Karelin & Kirilov) Al-Shehbaz & 0. Appel, comb. nov. Basionym: Arabis erysimoides Karelin & Kiri¬ lov, Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 15: 145. 1842. Prionotrichon erysimoides (Karelin N Kirilov) Botschantsev & Vvedensky, Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Zool. Akad. Nauk Uz- bekst. S.S.R. 12: 8. 1948. TYPE: [Kazakhstan. Dzungaria], between Chulak and Ai rivers, 1841, G. S. Karelin & I. P. Kirilov 1192 (ho¬ lotype, EE; isotypes, B, P). Distribution. Endemic to Kazakhstan. 4. Rhammatophyllum gaudauense (Litvinov) Al-Shehbaz & O. Appel, comb. nov. Basionym: Erysimum gaudanense Litvinov, Trudy Bot. Muz. Imp. Akad. Nauk 1: 33. 1902. Priono¬ trichon gaudanense (Litvinov) Botschantsev, Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 3: 125. (1966). TYPE: [Turkmenistan], “in deelivibus herbosis montium prope Gaudan,” 28 Apr. 1898, I). I. Litvinov 518 (holotype, LE; isotype, WU). Distribution. Turkmenistan and Afghanistan. 5. Rhammatophyllum ghoraimm (K. H. Rechin- ger) Al-Shehbaz & 0. Appel, comb. nov. Bas¬ ionym: Koeiea ghorana K. H. Rechinger, Anz. Osterr. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 101: 425. 1964. Prionotrichon ghoranum (K. H. Re¬ chinger) Botschantsev, Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 24: 97 (1987). TYPE: Afghanistan. Prov. Ghorat: Shutar Khan Kotal ridge, between Qala Ahangaren and Qala Sharak, ca. 34°20'N, 64°55'E, ca. 2725 m, 27 July 1962, K. II. Re¬ chinger 18866 (holotype, W; isotype, MO). Distribution. Endemic to Afghanistan. 6. Rhammatophyllum kamelinii (Botschantsev) Al-Shehl >az & O. Appel, comb. nov. Basionym: Prionotrichon kamelinii Botschantsev, Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 24: 98. 1987. TYPE: Mon¬ golia. Altay Mts., Uljastyjn-Gol, Bulgan-Gol, 10 July 1984, R. V. Kamelin & S. Darijmaa 331 (holotype, LE; isotype, MO). Distribution. Endemic to the Altay region of Mongolia. 7. Rhammalophyllum pseudoparrya (Bot¬ schantsev & Vvedensky) Al-Shehbaz & O. Ap¬ pel, comb. nov. Basionym: Prionotrichon pseu¬ doparrya Botschantsev & Vvedensky, Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Zool. Akad. Nauk Uz¬ beks!. S.S.R. 12: 8. 1948. TYPE: [Tajikistan]. Alaisky Range, Karategen, near river Kizil-Su, above Sarigul, 10 Sep. 1927. /. A. Raikova 1563 (holotype, TAK). Distribution. Northern Tajikistan and southern Kyrgyzstan. 8. Rhammatophyllum flexuosum (K. II. Re¬ chinger) Al-Shehbaz & O. Appel, comb. nov. Basionym: Koeiea flexuosa K. 11. Rechinger, Anz. Osterr. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 101: 426. 1964. Prionotrichon flexuosum (K. H. Rechinger) Botschantsev, Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast., 24: 99. 1987. TYPE: Afghani¬ stan. Prov. Kabul: Sanglakht, above Jalrez, ca. 34°30'N, 68°32'E, ca. 2400 m, 12 July 1962, K. H. Rechinger 18027 (holotype, W). 4 Novon Distribution. Endemic to Afghanistan. 9. Hliaiiimulopliyllum afghanicum (K. H. Re- chinger) Al-Shehbaz & 0. Appel, comb. nov. Basionym: Koeiea afghanica K. H. Rechinger, Anz. Osterr. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 91: 60. 1954. Prionotrichon afghanicum (K. H. Rechinger) Botschantsev, Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 3: 125. 1966. TYPE: Afghani¬ stan. Bend-i Amir, 2000 m, 19 Aug. 1948. M. Koie 2845 (holotype, C; isotype, W). Distribution. Endemic to Afghanistan. Kky to the Species oe Rhammatophyllvm la. Trichomes sulxlendritic, rarely mixed with (ewer suhmalpighiaeeous ones; fruits (2.5— )3— 4.5 mm wide; seeds broadly winged all around; Afghan¬ istan . 9. A', afghanicum lb. Trichomes malpighiaceous or submalpighia- ceous; fruits 1 — 2 ( — 2 .5) mrn wide; seeds wingless, margined, or narrowly winged all around, rarely broadly winged distally. 2a. Trichomes exclusively malpighiaceous with unbranched 2 rays; cotyledons incumbent; seeds wingless, rarely obscurely margined. 3a. Petals purple; shrubs ca. 50 cm tall; leaves 0.5— 2.5 cm X 0.9— 1.2 mm; Ka¬ zakhstan . 2. R. frutex 3b. Petals creamy white; plants subshrubs 10—30 cm tall; leaves (2.5 — )3 — 7 cm X ca. 0.5 mm; Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan . 1 . /\’. pachyrhizum 2b. Trichomes suhmalpighiaeeous, with minute lateral branches on the 2 rays; cotyledons accumbent; seeds winged, rarely margined. 4a. Leaves with a distinct petiole 0.5—2 cm long; fruits 5-8 cm long; replum straighl between the seeds in mature fruit. 5a. Petals 10—13 X 5—7 mm; leaves 2— 7 mm wide; petiole 1—2 cm long; Altay of Mongolia ... 0. A’. kamelinii 5b. Petals 7— H X 3— f mm; leaves to I mm wide; petiole rarely to I cm long; Kazakhstan . . 3. R. erysimoides 4b. Leaves sessile; fruits 1.5— 4(— 5) cm long; replum often constricted between the seeds in mature fruit. 6a. Gynophore 1—3 mm long; racemes (lexuous in fruit; sterile shoots often well developed, with leaves to 2—3 cm long; Afghanistan 8. R. flexuosum 6b. Gynophore obsolete, rarely to 0.7 mm long; racemes not (lexuous in fruit; sterile shoots absent, i( present then with leaves rarely to 1.5 cm long. 7a. Leaves flat; seeds distinctly winged all around; Afghanistan . 5. R. ghoranum 7h. Leaves longitudinally plicate; seeds narrowly margined at least distally. 8a. Petals pilose outside; gy¬ nophore obsolete; style to 1 mm; Afghanistan and Turkmenistan . . 4. R. gaudanense 8b. Petals glabrous outside; gynophore distinct, to 0.7 mm; style 1-2 mm; Taji¬ kistan and Kyrgyzstan . . . 7. R. pseudoparrya Acknowledgments. We are grateful to Tatyana Shulkina for her help in the translation of Russian text. We thank Michael (1. Gilbert and Anthony R. Bracli for their help with the literature. Literature Cited Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1985. The genera of Thelypodieae (Cru- eiterae; Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 95—1 1 I. Botschantsev, V. P. 1952. Plantae novae ex Asia Media. Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Uzbeksk. S.S.B. 13: 3-20. - . 1966. De Cruciferis notae eriticae, 5. Novosti Sisl. Vyssh. Bast. 3: 122-139. - . 1987. He genere Prionotrichon Botsch. et Vved. (Cruciferae— Arabideae). Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Bast. 24: 96-1 00. - & A. I. Vvedensky. 1948. Cruciferae novae ex Asia Media. Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Zool. Akad. Nauk Uzhekst. S.S.B. 12: 3-12. Czerepanov, S. K. 1995. Vascular Plants of Bussia and Adjacent States (the former USSB). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Greene, E. L. 1904. Certain West American Cruciferae. Lead. Bot. Observ. Grit. I: 81—90. Hedge, I. C. 1968. Arabideae. In: K. H. Rechinger (edi¬ tor), Flora Iraniea 57; 193—218. Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz. Koch, M.. J. Bishop & T. Mitchell-Olds. 1999. Molecular systematies and evolution of Arahidopsis and Arabis. PI. Biol. I: 529-537. Nabiev, M. 1972. Botschantzevia Nabiev — Genus novum Crueiferarum. Novosti Sisl. Vyssh. Bast. 9: 186—187. Polatschek, A. & K. II. Rechinger. 1968. Erysimum. In: K. H. Rechinger (editor). Flora Iraniea 57: 285—05. Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt. Graz. Rechinger, K. II. 1954. Cruciferae novae Afghanicae. Anz. Osterr. Akad. Wiss.. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 91: 58—64. - . 1964. Notizen zur Orient-Flora, 63—69: Neue Crueiferen aus Afghanistan. Anz. Osterr. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 101: 122—127. - . 1968. Matthioleae. In: K. H. Rechinger (editor). Flora Iraniea 57: 219-250. Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt. Graz. Rollins. B. C. 1993. The Cruciferae of Continental North America. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford. Schulz, (). E. 1933a. Eine neue Cruciferen-Gattung in Mit- telasien. Notizbl. Bot. Cart. Berlin-Dahlem I I: 872—873. - . 1933b. fiber verschiedene Crueiferen. Bepert. Sp. Nov. Begni Veg. 33: 183-191. - . 1936. Cruciferae. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (ed¬ itors), Hie naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2, 17B: 227-658. Verlag von Wilhelm Englemann, Leipzig. Vassiljeva. A. N. 1969. Species novae generum Parrya B. Br„ Ermania Cham., Rhammatophyllum 0. E. Schulz ex Asia Media. Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Kazakhsk. S.S.B. 6: 17-26. Cardaria, Coronopus, and Stroganowia are United with Lepidium (Brassicaceae) Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz Missouri Botanical Garden, P.0. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A. Klaus Mummenhoff Department of Botany, Faculty of Biology/Chemistry, University of Osnabriick, Barbarastr. 11, D-49069 Osnabriick, Germany Oliver Appel Bredkamp 36E, 22589 Hamburg, Germany ABSTRACT. The genera Cardaria (including / / v- menophysa), Coronopus, and Stroganowia are hard¬ ly distinct morphologically from the larger h'pi- dium, and t he distinctions of all four genera are based solely on a few fruit characters of doubtful value. Recent molecular data strongly suggest that the genera Coronopus and Stroganowia are poly- phyletic and, together with Cardaria, are nested within Lepidium. Therefore, they are herein for¬ mally united with Lepidium, the earliest published generic name in this group. The new names L. ap- pelianum, L. botschantsevianum , L. buschianum, L. karelinianum, and L. mummenhoffianum are pro¬ posed because the transfer of their replaced names to Lepidium would create later homonyms. The fol¬ lowing 20 new combinations are proposed: L. brachyotum, L. cardiophyllum, L. englerianum, L. lepidioides, L. litwinowii, L. longifolium, L. minor, L. navasii, L. paniculatum , L. rhytidocarpum, L. ro- bustum, L. sagittatum, L. saravschanicum, L. ser¬ ration, L. tianschanicurn, L. tiehmii, L. tolmaczovii, L. trautvetteri, L. violaceum, and L. zambiensis. Key words: Brassicaceae, Cardaria, Coronopus, II ymenophysa, Lepidium, Stroganowia. During work by two of us (Al-Shehbaz and Ap¬ pel) on the forthcoming account of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) for K. Kubitzki's Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, and on the basis of molecular studies on the genus Lepidium L. and relatives, such as Cardaria Desvaux, Coronopus Zinn, and Stroganowia Karelin & Kirilov (Bowman et ah, 1999; Bruggemann, 2000; Mummenhoff, 1995; Mummenhoff et ah. in press; Mummenhoff, unpub¬ lished), it has become amply evident that only one genus is involved, and that nomenclatural adjust¬ ments are needed to make the names available lor several floristic works in progress. Iwpidium is a cosmopolitan genus of about 175 species distributed on all continents except Ant¬ arctica (Al-Shehbaz, 1986). It is one of the most natural and readily distinguished of all genera in the family. As presently delimited, all species have angustiseptate fruits with two subapical ovules (one in each locule), and the trichomes (when present) are always simple. The flowers in more than half of the species have just two stamens, and the petals in most of those are rudimentary or lacking. In the remaining species of Lepidium, the flowers are al¬ ways petaliferous and have either six or four sta¬ mens (Thellung, 1906; Al-Shehbaz, 1986). For the reduction of stamen number in Lepidium, the in¬ terested reader should consult Bowman and Smyth (1998) and Bowman et al. (1999). The genera Cardaria, Coronopus, and Stroga¬ nowia resemble Lepidium in having similar fruit structure, two ovules per ovary, and simple tri¬ chomes. Most of them have six stamens, but a few species of Coronopus have two stamens, just like the majority of Lepidium. As shown below, the prin¬ cipal characters used to distinguish these genera from Lepidium are based solely on minor differenc¬ es in fruit morphology. However, recent molecular studies (Mummenhoff et al., in press) have clearly shown that the genera Cardaria, Coronopus, and Stroganowia are nested within Lepidium, that Co¬ ronopus and Stroganowia are definitely polyphylet- ic, and that Lepidium is paraphyletic. Cardaria Cardaria is said to differ from Lepidium by hav¬ ing indehiscent instead of dehiscent fruits, and both genera were recognized in most of the major floris- Novon 12; 5-11. 2002. 6 Novon tic or monographic works, including those by Schulz (1936), Hedge (1968), Hewson (1982), Al- Shehbaz (1986), Schultze-Motel (1986). Hollins (1993), and Tulin et al. (1993). However, as indi¬ cated by Thellung (1906), there are some species of Lepidium with tardily dehiscent or even indehis- cent fruits. In fact, some authors (e.g., Thellung, 1906; Busch, 1939a; Rich, 1991) reduced Cardaria to synonymy of Lepidium, though Busch (1939a, 1939b) also recognized Hymenophysa C. A. Meyer as a related genus with two species. By contrast, Schulz (1936) recognized Cardaria as a monotypie genus that he placed with Lepidium in the tribe Lepidieae and treated Hymenophysa as a monotypie genus that he placed in the tribe Euelidieae. The single character that Schulz (1936) used to separate Cardaria from Hymenophysa (and the two tribes in which he placed them) is the presence of angusti- septate (flattened at a right angle to the septum) vs. inflated fruits. The example of Cardaria-Hymeno- physa shows that heavy reliance on the type of com¬ pression of fruit led to the artificial delimitation of genera and tribes. For another example, the vast majority ol the approximately 170-190 species of Alyssum I.. have latiseptate fruits (flattened parallel to tin1 septum), and only a few species (e.g., A. tur- gidum T. R. Dudley and A. glohosum Grossheim) have distinctly inflated fruits (Dudley, 1964; Ave- lisian, 1980). Alyssum glohosum was placed in the monotypie genus Takhtajaniella V. E. Avetisian (Avetisian, 1980), but we believe that it is perfectly at home in Alyssum. Molecular data (Mummenhoff, 1995; Briigge- mann, 2000; Mummenhoff et al., in press) clearly demonstrated that Cardaria is nested within Lepi- dium, and that it is most closely related to L. cam- pestre E. and its relatives, which Thellung (1906) assigned to Lepidium sect. Lepia (Desvaux) DC. The cpDNA data (Mummenhoff et al.. in press) indicate monophyly of C. dralxi (L.) Desvaux and C. pubes- cens (C. A. Meyer) Jarmolenko, whereas the ITS data (Briiggemann, 2000) suggest polyphyly of Car¬ daria because C. pubescens appears to be more closely related to members of Lepidium sect. Lepia than does C. draba. However, both the cpDNA and ITS data show that Cardaria is nested well within Lepidium next to section Lepia. It is interesting to note that the type species of Cardaria was initially de¬ scribed by Linnaeus (1753) as Lepidium draba L. There is disagreement as to the number of spe¬ cies recognized in Cardaria. Mulligan and Frank- ton (1962) and Czerepanov (1995) recognized as many as five and six species, respectively. Bv con¬ trast. other authors (e.g.. Hedge, 1968; Al-Shehbaz, 1986) recognized two, while Rollins (1993) recog¬ nized three. We believe that only two species merit recognition, and both should be placed in Lepi¬ dium. These are L. draba, which consists of sub¬ species draba and chalapense (L.) Thellung, and L. appelianum Al-Shehbaz, a new' name proposed herein because the transfer of Hymenophysa pubes¬ cens C. A. Meyer to Lepidium would create a later homonym of the South American L. pubescens Des¬ vaux. CoROMm .s Coronopus consists of 10 species native to South America, Africa, Southwest Asia, and adjacent Eu¬ rope (Al-Shehbaz, 1986). It differs from Lepidium primarily by having didvmous fruits with thickened, reticulate, rugose, to tuberculate (rarely smooth), indehiscent fruit valves. In three species (C. navasii Ban. C. squamatus (Forsskal) Ascherson, and C. violaceus (Munby) Kuntze) the fruits are not didy- mous while in the remaining seven ( C. didymus (L.) Smith, C. integrifolius (DC.) Sprengel, C. niloticus (Delile) Sprengel, C. lepidioides (Cosson & Durieu) Kuntze, C. serratus (Poiret) Desvaux, C. rhytidocar- pus (Hooker) Macloskie, and C. zambiensis Jonsell) they are distinctly didymous. Coronopus wrightii H. Hara (Japan, Taiwan) was reduced by Cheo et al. (2001) to synonymy of C. integrifolius (herein as L. englerianum). The valve orifice that faces the re¬ plum is usually smaller than the seed and, there¬ fore. the seeds are not readily released, and these valves act as the dispersal unit. In Lepidium the fruit is not didymous, anil the valves are generally thin and with orifices often wider than the seeds. Therefore, the seeds are easily released from the valves. However, in the southern Argentinian and Chilean L. pseudodidymum Thellung, the fruits somewhat approach C. didymus in their reticulation and thickness. In fact, L. pseudodidymum was treat¬ ed by Muschler (1908) as C. didymus subsp. aus¬ tralis (J. D. Hooker) Muschler and was later re¬ described by Boelcke (1975) as Coronopus leptocarpus Boelcke. This shows that Lepidium and Coronopus can hardly be delimited on morpholog¬ ical grounds. In our opinion, features of the fruit valves in Coronopus are adaptations for dispersal and are insignificant in the delimitation of the ge¬ nus. fhe development of thick, reticulate, rugose, or tuberculate fruit walls apparently evolved inde¬ pendently within Lepidium (including Coronopus). Molecular data by one of us (Mummenhoff, unpub¬ lished) clearly show that Coronopus is poly phy let ic and nested within Lepidium. Although molecular studies have not yet been done on the monotypie Delpinophytum Spegazzini, Volume 12, Number 1 2002 Al-Shehbaz et al. Genera Transferred to Lepidium 7 it is very likely that D. patagonicum (Spegazzini) Spegazzini is only a dwarf, pulvinate species o{ Lep¬ idium. The species was subsequently treated by Muschler (1908) as Coronopus patagonicus (Spe¬ gazzini) Muschler. Both C. didymus and C. squa- matus were originally described as /.. didymum L. and L. squamatum Forsskal, respectively. Corono¬ pus niloticus is known in Lepidium as L. niloticum (Delile) Sieber ex Steudel. For the remaining seven species of Coronopus , new combinations are pro¬ posed herein to accommodate their transfer to Lep¬ idium. Stroganowia Both Pavlov (1933, 1939) and Botschantsev (1984) provided brief synopses on Stroganowia, and the latter author recognized 21 species in the genus. The characters used to distinguish Stroga¬ nowia from Lepidium are the perennial habit and slightly angustiseptate or nearly quadrangular fruits. However, these features are tenuous at best, and many species of Lepidium (e.g., L. latifolium L. and relatives) resemble Stroganowia in habit. I'he degree of the fruit flattening is not a reliable feature either, and there are no other differences between the two genera. In fact, some species rec¬ ognized by Botschantsev (1984) as Stroganowia (e.g., S. affghana, S. subalpina) were treated by Thellung in Lepidium. who (1906: 157) suggested that Stroganowia is best treated as a section of Lep¬ idium. Molecular data available so far for seven species (Mummenhoff, unpublished) show that the Old World Stroganowia forms separate groups nest¬ ed within Lepidium. What was explicitly mentioned by Botschantsev (1984) about the dubious merit of Stroganowia has now been substantiated by Mum- menhofF s molecular studies. As for ,S. tiehmii Rol¬ lins. Price (pers. comm.) indicated that the species falls within the American species of Lepidium based on molecular studies. Therefore, Stroganowia is polyphvletie, and the alleged relationship of S. tiehmii with its nearest disjunct relatives in Central Asia (Rollins, 1982) has not been supported by mo¬ lecular data. All of Botschantsev s (1984) 21 species of Stro¬ ganowia merit recognition as species of Lepidium. Three species, S. affghana (Boissier) Pavlov, S. bu- pleuroides (k. H. Rechinger) Botschantsev, anil S. subalpina (Komarov) Thellung ex Pavlov, were orig¬ inally described in Lepidium , and their retention in that genus poses no nomenclatural problems. The transfer to Lepidium of .S', angustifolia Botschantsev & Vvedensky, S. intermedia Karelin & Kirilov, S. persica N. Busch, and S. rubtzovii Botschantsev would create later homonyms, and the following new names are proposed herein to accommodate them in Lepidium: L. botschantsevianum Al-Sheh- baz, L. harelinianum Al-Shehbaz, L. buschianum Al-Shehbaz, and L. mummenhoffianum Al-Sheh¬ baz, respectively. Upon its transfer to Lepidium, S. puberula Kitamura would become an illegitimate later homonym of L. puberulum Bunge. Therefore, S. puberula should be recognized in Lepidium as L. altissimum K. H. Rechinger, which is the earliest legitimate name for the species in Lepidium. New combinations in Lepidium are proposed herein to accommodate the remaining 13 species of Stroga¬ nowia: S. brachyota Karelin & Kirilov, S. cardi- ophylla Pavlov, S. litwinowii Lipsky, S. longifolia (Boissier) Botschantsev & Vvedensky (originally described as Heldreichia longifolia Boissier), S. mi¬ nor Botschantsev & Vvedensky, S. paniculata Re¬ gel & Schmalhausen, S. robusta Pavlov, S. sagittata Karelin & Kirilov, S. saravschanica Bulgakova, S. tianschanica Botschantsev & Vvedensky, .S’, tiehmii Rollins, S. tolmaczovii Junussov, and S. trautvetteri Botschantsev. Lepidium L., Sp. PI. 2: 643. 1753. TYPE: Lepi¬ dium latifolium L. (lectotype, designated by Britton & Brown, 1913). Coronopus Zinn, Cat. PI. Hort. Gott. 325. 1757, nom. cons. TYPE: Coronopus squamatus (Forsskiil) Asoherson. Cardaria Desvaux, J. Bot. Agric. 3: 163. 1815. TYPE: Cardaria draba (L.) Desvaux. Stroganowia Karelin & Kirilov, Bull. Soc. Imp. Natural- istes Moscou 14: 386. 1841. TYPE: Stroganowia sagittata Karelin & Kirilov (lectotype, designated by Botschantsev, 1984). Although Greuter et al. (1993, 2000) listed the type species of Coronopus as C. ruellii Allioni. which is based on Cochlearia coronopus I ... both of these specific epithets are synonyms of Lepidium squamatum Forrskal. Cochlearia coronopus and Co¬ ronopus ruellii are correctly listed as synonyms of L. squamatum by Hedge (1968) and Greuter et al. (1986), respectively. Lepidium appelianum Al-Shehbaz, nom. nov. Re¬ placed name: Hymenophysa pubescens C. A. Meyer, in Ledebour, Icon. PI. 2: 20. 1830. non Lepidium pubescens Desvaux, J. Bot. Agric. 3: 180. 1815, nec L. pubescens Tineo. Cat. PI. Hort. Panorm. 150. 1827. TYPE: [Kazakhs¬ tan.] “Locis humidis subsalsis deserti Soon- goro-kirghisici orientalis versus montes Ar- kaul.” 14 May 1826, C. A. Meyer s.n. (lectotype, designated here, I ,E). The choice of C. A. Meyer s.n. as the lectotype 8 Novon was based on the fact that L. appelianum is a new name replacing the later homonym L. pubescens, and this collection was among those cited in the original publication. The species is named in honor of Oliver Appel, one of the authors of the present paper and an ex¬ pert on the Brassieaceae. Lepidium botschuntsevianum Al-Shehbaz. nom. nov. Replaced name: Stroganowia angustifolia Botschantsev & Vvedensky, Rot. Mater. Gerh. Inst. Rot. Zool. Akad. Nauk Uzhekst. S.S.R. 12: II. 1948, non Lepidium angustifolium Rushy, Deser. S. Amer. PI. 23. 1920. TYPE: | Uzbekistan. | Samarkand: Zarafshon, Katta Gorgansky, Ml. Actao, near village Shamani. 24 May 1925, M. G. Popov 349 (holotype, TASH). The new name commemorates Victor Petrovich Botschantsev (1910—1990), an outstanding expert on the Brassieaceae of the former Soviet Union. Lepidium hraeliyotuin (Karelin & Kirilov) Al- Shehhaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Stroganowia brachyota Karelin & Kirilov, Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 14: 387. 1841. TYPE: “In montosis deserti Soongoro-Kirghisiei prope Ajagus," June 1840, G. S. Karelin & I. P. Kir¬ ilov s.n. (holotype, LE). Lepidium hiiscliiuniim Al-Shehhaz, nom. nov. Replaced name: Stroganowia persica IN. Busch, Zliurn. Russk. Rot. Obshch. Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. II: 225. 1926, non Lepidium persicum Boissier, Ann. Sci. Nat. ser. 2, 17: 196. 1842. TY PE: N Iran. Tabris (Atropatan- ia): Mt. Scher-Dara, between Sofian and Se- jvan, 1430-1500 m. 18 June 1924, A. Gross- heirn s.n. (holotype, LE). The new name commemorates Nicolai Adolfo- witscli Busch (1869—1941), an outstanding expert of the Brassieaceae of Asia and the author of most of the accounts of Brassieaceae for the Flora of the former Soviet Union (see Busch, 1939a, 1939b). Lepidiuni cardiophyllum (Pavlov) Al-Shehbaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Stroganowia cardiophyl- la Pavlov, Rot. Zhurn. S.S.S.R. 18: 364. 1933. TYPE: [Turkmenistan.] “Turkestania Ross., prov. Syr-Darja, montes Maschat-tau (prae- montorium Alatau Talassici), in decliviis glar- eosis pratensibus ail trajeetum Dau-baba, 1200 m,” 31 Aug. 1931, N. V. Pavlov 1226 (holotype, MW: isotype, LE). Lepidium eiiglerinnuiii (Muschler) Al-Shehbaz. comb. nov. Basionym: Coronopus englerianus Muschler. Rot. Jahrb. Syst. 41: 139. 1908. TYPE: Mozambique. Mouth of Zambezi River, Peters s.n. (holotype, B). The earliest name for the species is Senebiera integrifolia I)C. (Mem. Soc. Hist. Nat. Paris I: 144. 1799), but the transfer of its specific epithet to Isp- idium would create a later homonym of L. integri- folium Nuttall ex Torrey A. Gray. The second earliest name for the species is Senebiera linoides DC., but the transfer of its specific epithet to Lep- idium would create a later homonym of L. linoides Thunberg. According to Marais (1970), the last spe¬ cies is a synonym of Lepidiuni divaricatum Aiton. Jonsell (1974) was the first to reduce Coronopus englerianus to synonymy of S. integrifolia , and the epithet “ englerianus " is the earliest available name that can be used for the species in Lepidium. Lepidium karelinianuin Al-Shehbaz, nom. nov. Replaced name: Stroganowia intermedia Ka¬ relin & Kirilov, Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 15: 162. 1842, non Lepidium inter¬ medium A. Richard, Tent. FI. Abyss. 1: 21. 1847. TYPE: “In montosis apricis Alatau inter fluvios Baskan et Sarchan,” July 1841. G. S. Karelin A /. P. Kirilov s.n. (lectotype, desig¬ nated by Pavlov (1933), LE; isolectotype, MW). The new name honors Grigorij Siliovitsch Kare¬ lin (1801—1872), one of the famous botanical ex¬ plorers of central Asia. Lepidium lepidioides (Gosson & Durieu) Al- Shehbaz. comb. nov. Basionym: Senebiera lep¬ idioides Cosson & Durieu, Bull. Soc. Bot. France 2: 245. 1855. TYPE: Algeria. “In di- tione Mzab prope Gucrrara." 3 Nov. 1854, V. G. Rehoud s.n. (holotype, P). Lepidium litwinowii (Lipsky) Al-Shehbaz, comb, nov. Basionym: Stroganowia litwinowii Lipsky, Trudy Imp. S.-IVterburgsk. Bot. Sada 26: 121. 1910. TYPE: Turkmenistan. Mountains near Gaudan, 30 May 1898. D. Litwinow 625 (ho¬ lotype. LE). Lepidium longifolium (Boissier) Al-Shehbaz. comb. nov. Basionym: Heldreichia longifolia Boissier, Ann. Sci. Nat. ser. 2. 17: 187. 1842. TYPE: Iran. Mount Zerdakou [Zard Kuh], Aucher 320 (holotype, G). Hedge (1968) had correctly questioned the in- Volume 12, Number 1 2002 Al-Shehbaz et al. Genera Transferred to Lepidium 9 elusion of the species in Heldreichia Boissier be¬ cause of its habit, non-fleshy leaves, and toothless filaments, lie indicated that the species should ei¬ ther be placed in a monotypic genus or in Stroga- nowia. As indicated by Botschantsev and Vveden¬ sky (1948), the species is morphologically very close to S. angustifolia (herein as Lepidium bot- schantsevianum). Lepidium minor (Botschantsev & Vvedensky) Al- Shehbaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Stroganowia minor Botschantsev & Vvedensky, Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Zool. Akad. Nauk Uzbekst. S.S.R. 3: 19. 1941. TYPE: [Tajikistan.] Pamir: | up B iver Yakabag Darya, around village Tash- korgan], 18 June 1936, Botschantsev & Butkov 8 (holotype, FASH # 161584). It is quite possible that the collection was actu¬ ally made from near Taxkorgan, a town in the south¬ western Xinjiang Autonomous region at the Taji- kistan-China border, as such town no longer exists in Tajikistan. Lepidium mummenhoffianum Al-Shehbaz, nom. nov. Replaced name: Stroganowia rubtzovii Botschantsev, Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 21: 79. 1984, non Lepidium rubtzovii Vassilczenko, Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Ka- zakhsk. S.S.R. 4: 40. 1966. TYPE: “Juguni Alatau Dzhungaricus, distr. inter pagos Sar- kand et Kopal, locus Bel-Bulak.” 20 July 1934, N. /. Rubtzov s.n. (holotype, EE). The species is named in honor of Klaus Mum- menhoff, one of the authors of this paper, in rec¬ ognition for his extensive molecular work on Lepi¬ dium and related genera. Lepidium navasii (Pau) Al-Shehbaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Coronopus navasii Pau, Butl. Inst. Catalana Hist. Nat. 22: 31. 1922. TYPE: Spain. Sierra de Gador, 2000 m, B. Navas s.n. (holotype, MA not seen). Lepidium paniculatum (Regel & Schmalhausen) Al-Shehbaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Stroganow¬ ia paniculata Regel & Schmalhausen, Trudy Imp. S.-Peterburgsk. Bot. Sada 5: 242. 1877. TYPE: Raskrask, “in valle fluvii” Tschirtschik, 8000-9000 ft., Aug. 1876, A. Regel s.n. (lec- totype, designated by Pavlov (1933), EE). Lepidium rhytidocarpum (Hooker) Al-Shehbaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Senebiera rhytidocarpa Hooker, London ,1. Bot. 2: 506. 1843. TYPE: Patagonia, Tweede s.n. (holotype, K). Lepidium robustum (Pavlov) Al-Shehbaz, comb, nov. Basionym: Stroganowia robusta Pavlov, Bot. Zhurn. S.S.S.R. 18: 367. 1933. TYPE: Turkmenistan. Mt. Boroldaj-tau, summit of Bu- kuj-tau, 1600 m, 27 June 1931, N. Pavlov 397 (holotype, MW; isotype, EE). Lepidium sagitlatum (Karelin & Kirilov) Al- Shehbaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Stroganowia sagittata Karelin & Kirilov, Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 14: 387. 1841. TYPE: “In arenosis ad radicem montium Tarbagati prae- sertim ad torrentes Dschany-bek et Terekty,” May 1840, G. S. Karelin & /. P. Kirilov s.n. (holotype, EE). Lepidium saravschanicum (Bulgakova) Al-Sheh- baz. comb. nov. Basionym: Stroganowia sar- avschanica Bulgakova, Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Uzbeks. S.S.R. 20: 8. 1982. TYPE: Uzbekistan. Jugum Seravschanicum, above Sarykol, vicinity of Tillja-Tikan, ca. 1000 m, 13 June 1980, L. L. Bulgakova s.n. (holotype, TASH; isotype, MO). Lepidium serratum (Poiret) Al-Shehbaz, comb, nov. Basionym: Senebiera serrata Poiret, in Ea- marck, Encycl. 7: 76. 1806. TYPE: [Uruguay]. Montevideo, Commerson s.n. (holotype, P-JU). Lepidium serratum is unrelated to and should not be confused wi th the H awaiian L. serra H. Mann. Lepidium tianschanicum (Botschantsev & Vved¬ ensky) Al-Shehbaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Stroganowia tianschanica Botschantsev & Vvedensky, Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Zool. Akad. Nauk Uzbekst. S.S.R. 12: 12. 1948. TYPE: [Kyrgyzstan.] W Tian Shan, Maidantal- sky, Chotan-gutsai, 24 July 1940, V. Makar- chuk s.n. (holotype, TASH). Lepidium tiehmii (Rollins) Al-Shehbaz, comb, nov. Basionym: Stroganowia tiehmii Rollins, Syst. Bot. 7: 215. 1982. TYPE: U.S.A. Nevada: Lyon County, Virginia Range, SE of Talapoosa Peak, T19N, R24E, sect. 34, 5900 ft., 1 June 1980, A. Tiehtn 5783, F. Almeda & M. Wil¬ liams (holotype, Gil; isotype, MO). Lepidium tolmaezovii (Junussov) Al-Shehbaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Stroganowia tolmaezovii Junussov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk Tadzh. SSR 18(2): 62. 1975. TYPE: W Tajikistan. Karatau ridge, 4 km N of Mt. Chodzha-Maston, 17 May 1960, A. Meczislavskij & V. N. Zavedeev 675 (holo¬ type, LE). 10 Novon Ecpiilium trautveiteri (Botschantsev) Al-Sheli- baz, comb. nov. Basionym: Stroganowia traut- vetteri Botschantsev, in Komarov, FI. URSS 8: 652. 1939. TYPE: [Kazakhstan.] Ad lacnm Balchasch, Betpak-dala, 13 June 1843. A. Schrenk 399 (holotype, EE). Gcpidiiiiu violuccum (Munby) Al-Shchbaz. comb, nov. Basionym: Senebiera violacea Munby, Bull. Soc. Bot. France 2: 282. 1855. TYPE: Algeria. Dhaya-Baalis, Ain-Turck, near Oran, G. Munby s.n. (holotype, K?). Lcpidiiiin zanibiensis (Jonscll) Al-Shchbaz, comb. nov. Basionym: Coronopus zanibiensis Jonscll, Bot. Not. 127: 1 16. 1 974. TYPE: Zam¬ bia. Kalabo District: Liuwa Plain, Paramount Chiefs Game Reserve, ca. 45 km N of Kalabo, 14 Sep. 1959, Drummond & Cookson 6/53 (holotype, BM; isotypes, BR, COI. I .ISC. SRGH; see Jonscll. 1974). Acknowledgments. We arc grateful to Tatyana Shulkina and Eidiya Toropova for their help in the translation of Russian literature and herbarium la¬ bels. We thank Michael G. Gilbert and Anthony R. Brach for providing photocopies of some of the original literature. We arc indebted to Neil llar- riman. an anonymous reviewer, and Victoria C. Hollowed for tbeir critical reviews of the manu¬ script. Literature Cited Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1986. The genera of Lepidieae (Cruci- ferae; Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 67: 265—31 1. Avetisian, V. E. 1980. Takhtajaniella V. Avet. — A new genus of Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) from Caucasus. Pp. 54—57 in S. G. Zhilin (editor), Systematics and Evo¬ lution of Higher Plants. Academy ol Sciences, Lenin¬ grad. Boelcke, 0. 1975. I )na nueva especie de Coronopus del litoral Chileno, C. leptocarpus (Cruciferae). Darwiniana 19: 386-399. Botschantsev, V. 1 984. Genus Stroganowia Kar. et Kir. Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Bast. 21: 72-81. - & A. I. Vvedensky. 1948. Cruciferae novae ex Asia Media. Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Zool. Akad. Nauk Uzbekst. S.S.B. 12: 3-12. Bowman, J. L. & 1). B. Smyth. 1998. Patterns of petal and stamen reduction in Australia species of Lepidium (Brassicaceae). Int. .1. PI. Sci. 159: 65—74. - . H. BrUggemann, J.-Y. Lee & K. Mummenhoff. 1999. Evolutionary changes in Moral structure within lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). Int. J. PI.. Sci. 160: 917- 929. Britton, N. L. & A. Brown. 1913. An Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada, and the British Possessions, Ed. 2, vol. 2. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. Briiggemann, II. 2000. Molekulare Systematik und Bio- geographie der Gattung lepidium L. und verwandter Sippen (Brassicaceae). Ph.l). Thesis, University of Os- nabrtick. Busch, N. A. 1939a. lepidium. In: V. L. Komarov (editor), FI. UBSS ft: 501—524. Akademii Nauk SSSB. Moscow and Leningrad. - . 1939b. Hymenophysa. In: V. L. Komarov (editor), FI. UBSS ft: 535—537. Akademii Nauk SSSB. Moscow and Leningrad. Cheo, T Y.. L. L. Lou, G. Yang & I. A. Al-Shehbaz. 2001. Brassicaceae. In: C. Y. Wu & P. H. Raven (editors). Flora of China 8: 1-193. Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. Czerepanov, S. K. 1995. Vascular Plants of Bussia and Adjacent States (the former USSB). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Dudley, T. B. 1964. Alyssum turgidum, a new species from Iran. Great Basin Naturalist 24: 7-12. Greuler, W., II. M. Burdet & G. Long, (editors). 1986. Med-checklist. Vol. 3. Conservatoire et Jardin bota- niques, Genfeve. - , B. K. Brummitt, F. Farr, N. Kilian, P. M. Kirk & P. C. Silva (editors). 1993. Names in Current Use for Extant Plant Genera. Koeltz Scientific Books, Kiinig- stein. - . J. McNeill, E B. Barrie, H. M. Burdet. V. I)e- moulin. T. S. Filgueiras, I). H. Nieolson, P. C. Silva, J. E. Skog. P. Trehane, N. J. Turland & 1). L. Hawk- sworth (editors). 2000. International Code of Botan¬ ical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code). Begnum Veg. 138. Hedge, I. C. 1968. Lepidieae. In: K. II. Beehinger (edi¬ tor), 14. Iranica 57: 63—131. Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz. Hewson, H. J. 1982. Brassicaceae. In: B. G. Briggs et al. (editors), H. Australia 8: 231—357. Australian Govern¬ ment Publishing Service, Canberra. Jonsell, B. 1974. Coronopus zambiensis (Cruciferae), a new species from tropical Africa. Bot. Not. 127: I 13—1 18. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Impensis Laurentii Slavii, Holmiae [Stockholm]. Marais, W. 1970. Cruciferae. In: L. E. Codd et al. (editors), FI. South Africa 13: 1 — 118. Government Printer, Pre¬ toria. Mulligan, G. A. & C. Frankton. 1962. T; ixonoiny of the genus Cardaria with particular reference to the species introduced into North America. Canad. J. Bot. 40: 1411-1425. Mummenhoff, K. 1995. Should Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. be classified within the genus lepidium L. (Brassica¬ ceae)? Evidence from subunit polypeptide composition of BUBISCO. Feddes Repert. 106: 25— 28. - . H. BrUggemann & J. E. Bowman. 2001. Chloro- plast l)NA phylogeny and biogeography of lepidium (Brassicaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 88: 2051—2063. Muschler, B. 1908. Die Gattung Coronopus (L.) Gaertn. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 41: 1 I 1-147. Pavlov, N. V. 1933. Kurze Uebersicht der Gattung Stron- ganowia Kar. et Kir. Bot. /hum. S.S.S.B. 8: 363-369. [In Bussian, German summary.] - . 1939. Stroganowia. In: V. E. Komarov (editor), FI. UBSS 8: 524—535. Akademii Nauk SSSB. Moscow and Leningrad. Rich, T. (7 G. 1991. Crucifers of (heat Britain and Ire¬ land. Bot. Soc. Brit. Isles Handb. 6: 1—336. London. Rollins, B. C. 1982. A new species of the Asiatic genus Volume 12, Number 1 2002 Al-Shehbaz et al. Genera Transferred to Lepidium 11 Stroganowia (Cruciferae) from North America and its biogeographic implications. Syst. Rot. 7: 214—220. - . 1993. The Cruciferae of Continental North Amer¬ ica. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford. Sehultze-Motel, W. (editor). 1986. Cruciferae. 1 1 lustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, ed. 3, 4(1): 73—514, 556-595. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin. Schulz, 0. E. 1936. Cruciferae. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (editors), Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2, I 7B: 227-658. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. Thellung, A. 1906. Die Gattung Lepidium (L.) R. Br. Fine monographische Studie. Neue Denkschr. Allg. Schweiz. Ges. Gesammten Naturwiss. 41(1): 1—340. Tutin, T. G„ et al. (editors). 1993. Cruciferae. FI. Euro- paea, ed. 2. 1: 313-417. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam¬ bridge. Iwo New Species of Nanuza (Velloziaceae) from Brazil Ruy Jose Vdlka Alves Departamento de Botanica, Herbario, Museu Nacional, Quinta da Boa Vista s.n., Sao Cristovao, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Austkact. Nanuza almeidae Alves an